A social media marketing package is a fixed-scope, fixed-price offer a client can understand and buy without a bespoke proposal. Rather than quoting every engagement from scratch, you define two or three standard shapes of work — a set number of posts, on a set number of networks, with a defined list of extras — and sell those repeatedly. Productizing social media management this way shortens your sales cycle, makes delivery predictable, and improves margin through better process instead of higher rates.
This is a different problem from setting your number. If you haven't worked out what an hour of your time needs to earn, start with the seller-side pricing playbook and the breakdown of what to charge for social media management. The buyer's view of what social media management actually costs tells you where your tiers will land against the market. Everything below assumes you already know your floor and tackles the narrower job: what shape you pour that number into so clients can choose for themselves.
Pick one unit of delivery and never break it
Custom work resists packaging because every proposal measures itself differently. One quote counts hours, the next counts "campaigns", the third counts vaguely-defined "content". A client can't compare those, and neither can you when you review profitability at year end.
The most durable unit for social is posts per network per month. It is countable, a client grasps it in one second, and it maps to how you actually produce. Three units to avoid:
- Hours. They punish you for getting faster and turn every improvement you make into a pay cut.
- Posts per week. Months are not four weeks. You'll owe a fifth week four or five times a year and nobody will agree on which.
- "Content pieces." Undefined nouns become whatever the client imagined at signing, which is always more than you imagined.
Once you pick the unit, hold it everywhere: the package page, the contract, the calendar, the monthly report. When the same number appears in all four places, scope arguments mostly stop happening.
The three-tier architecture
Three tiers is the standard for a reason: two feels like a trick, four or more stalls the decision. Here is a concrete shape you can adapt — the numbers are illustrative, the structure is the point.
| Local | Growth | Signature | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Networks | 2 | 4 | up to 6 |
| Posts per network / month | 8 | 12 | 16 |
| Content sourced from | Client's assets + your captions | Client's assets + your captions and light design | Original production included |
| Calendar & approvals | Shared calendar, one approver | Shared calendar, one approver | Multi-stakeholder approval routing |
| Reporting | Monthly summary | Monthly report | Monthly report + live review call |
| Strategy | Onboarding session | Onboarding + quarterly reset | Kickoff audit + quarterly planning |
| Response time | 3 business days | 2 business days | Next business day |
Three rules govern the ladder.
The bottom tier must be profitable on its own. A loss-leader entry package fills your roster with the clients who demand the most and pay the least. If Local doesn't clear your floor, raise it or delete it — don't subsidise it.
The middle tier is the one you're actually selling. Everything about the page should make Growth the obvious answer: it's the one with the "most popular" marker, the one whose feature list reads as complete, the one whose price sits close enough to Local that stepping up feels cheap and far enough below Signature that it feels sensible.
The top tier has to be real. It exists partly as an anchor, but if someone buys it you must be able to deliver it at that price without resentment. A fantasy tier you'd hate to fulfil is a trap you set for yourself.
Decide what only lives in the top tier
This is the decision most packages get wrong. If every tier contains the same work in different quantities, you don't have three products — you have one product at three prices, and buyers will simply pick the cheapest.
Good candidates for top-tier-only inclusion share a trait: they cost you calendar time rather than production time, so they don't scale and shouldn't be given away.
- Strategic work at kickoff. A full social media audit before the first post goes out is genuinely valuable and genuinely expensive to run. Lower tiers get an onboarding questionnaire; the top tier gets the audit.
- A live reporting conversation. Everyone gets numbers. Only Signature gets you on a call walking through them and recommending changes.
- Multi-stakeholder approvals. Routing content through a marketing lead, a founder, and a compliance reviewer is real coordination work. Price it as such.
- Original production. Shoots, edits, designed carousels — anything where you create the raw asset rather than arrange one the client supplied.
- Response-time commitments. A next-business-day guarantee constrains your whole week. It belongs at the top.
- A named senior person. If you have a team, "your account is run by me personally" is a legitimate premium.
Equally important is what you must not withhold. Reliable scheduling, correct per-platform formatting, a calendar the client can see, and captions that don't read as machine output are hygiene. Degrade those in the cheap tier and the cheap tier looks broken rather than modest — which poisons the whole page, because prospects read the bottom column first.
A useful test: your top tier should contain at least one thing you would refuse to do for the lower tiers at any price. If you can't name it, your tiers aren't differentiated yet.
Price the ladder around where your costs actually bend
Your cost curve is not linear, and the tiers should exploit that. The first network on a new account is expensive — brand voice, asset gathering, approval habits, a strategy you have to invent. The second, third, and fourth are dramatically cheaper if you build a content core once and adapt it, which is the whole argument for a one-post-many-platforms production method.
That gap is where tier margin lives. The client perceives "four networks instead of two" as double the service, and in outcome terms it is. In production terms, once you've written the core idea and gathered the assets, adapting a caption and swapping a crop is minutes of work.
Practically: compose the post once, then customise the caption, hashtags, and media per platform before it goes out — that's a normal SocialKit workflow, and it's what makes "posts per network per month" a unit you can promise without dreading the delivery. Because every SocialKit plan includes all 11 supported networks on flat pricing (from €29/month Solo, €17.40/month billed annually as of June 2026, with unlimited scheduled posts), your per-network tool cost doesn't step up when a client's package does — the only thing that moves your bill is how many social accounts you connect (Solo covers 15, Team 30), not which networks they are. The approval routing you sell in the top tier maps to the approval workflows on the Team and Enterprise plans.
One honest caveat while you're drafting inclusions: if your Growth tier promises comment replies and DM triage, price that as human time and plan to do it in the native apps. SocialKit doesn't include a unified inbox or a moderation queue, and community management is one of the few social deliverables that genuinely does not compress — an hour of replying is an hour, every month, forever. Either charge for it properly or leave it out of the package and sell it as a separate retainer.
Write a package page a client can self-select from
The goal of the page is that a prospect arrives at 9pm, reads for ninety seconds, and emails you saying "we want Growth, can we start in July." Every element serves that.
- Name tiers for the buyer, not for metals. Bronze/Silver/Gold tells no one anything. "Local", "Growth", "Signature" — or plainer still, "One-location business", "Multi-channel brand" — lets people find themselves.
- Lead each column with a one-line qualifier. "For a single-location business that needs to stay visible on Instagram and Facebook." That sentence does more selecting than the feature list beneath it.
- Show a price. "Contact us for a quote" filters out the good-fit buyers who are simply busy just as efficiently as it filters out tyre-kickers. If your work varies, use "from €X/month" and say what moves it.
- List deliverables in identical order across all three columns. Buyers compare by scanning rows. Reordering the list defeats the comparison and reads as evasive.
- State one exclusion per tier. "Local does not include original video production" is more trustworthy than silence, and it pre-empts the argument you'd otherwise have in month two.
- Put the add-on menu directly below, with prices: extra network, extra posts, ad-hoc campaign, extra reporting recipient. This is the pressure valve that keeps the three tiers clean.
- One CTA per column, same verb. Three different actions ("Buy", "Enquire", "Book a call") signals three different levels of welcome.
Then answer the six questions every buyer has, in a short FAQ: what's the minimum term, what happens if we need more posts than the tier includes, who owns the content, do you write the copy or do we, can we pause for a month, and what do you need from us to start. That last one is where you preview your intake process — worth linking to your own client onboarding steps so the buyer can see the machine behind the offer.
Keep a custom door, narrow and expensive
Some prospects genuinely don't fit. Give them a fourth, unpriced option — "Custom, from €X" — set above your Signature price so it never functions as a discount route. Any custom engagement should still be assembled from your standard components; you're changing quantities, not inventing new deliverables.
Packaging also becomes a prerequisite the moment you sell through other agencies. A reseller needs a spec sheet they can drop into their own pricing, which is why white-label social media management works far better on top of fixed tiers than on top of bespoke quotes.
Make the tiers survive contact with delivery
A package only sells twice — once to the client, once to your future self at 11pm on the last Sunday of the month. Three habits keep the second sale honest:
- Batch by tier, not by client. All Growth accounts get their next month's core content built in one sitting. The batch content creation workflow is what turns identical scope into identical process.
- Fix a reporting cadence and automate the shape of the report. Same sections, same order, every month — our guides to building a social media report and choosing a reporting cadence cover what to include per tier.
- Track capacity in tier units. Once you know that one operator comfortably runs, say, six Growth accounts, hiring and sales planning become arithmetic. The practices in managing multiple social media clients are what make that number stable rather than aspirational.
Start here: a five-step productization sprint
Give yourself a week and work in this order.
- Audit your last ten proposals. Write down what each actually delivered. Ignore what was promised — look at the work. You'll find three recurring shapes hiding inside the custom quotes.
- Name the unit. Posts per network per month, unless you have a strong reason otherwise. Rewrite those three shapes in that unit.
- Sort every deliverable into all-tiers, mid-and-up, or top-only. Anything you can't defend as top-only moves down. Anything that's hygiene moves to all-tiers.
- Price the ladder against your floor, then check that stepping from bottom to middle is easy and middle to top is a real decision. Add the add-on menu for everything that didn't make the cut.
- Publish the page with prices on it and stop sending custom proposals below your Signature price for thirty days.
The last step is the one people skip, and it's the one that produces the result. Packages don't work as an internal document — they work when a prospect can read them, place themselves in a column, and arrive in your inbox having already decided.